Evaluating California's Crisis Management Response
As crises become more frequent, entities need good crisis management plans to protect people, assets, operations, and infrastructure. Our experience includes District of Columbia and US Homeland Security emergency management strategy development; AT&T and other commercial emergency preparedness strategy development and planning support. As well as US Warfighter, FEMA, and ATF logistics, supply, and mission support.
Our specialized expertise includes AI modeling and forecasting; drone, space & satellite analytic; law enforcement training and support; ans Geoint, ESRI, and data mapping & analytics - fields that intersect closely with public safety response. Here is what California could stil do, we believe, to dramatically shorten fires duration and improve outcomes:
You cannot - or should not - throw humans on the ground at a 3-story, Santa Ana-driven wildfire. There is nothing they can do but get killed. Surveillance and targeting can be done via drone, satellite, and AI; and the BEST weapon - water (not foam, according to Nato and Australian military teams and US data) - is delivered via helicopter or aircraft. The days of firefighters standing on the ground facing wildfires should be over.
California doesn't 'get' this yet; and has STILL not asked or allowed the US military - with offers from the NL and EU to assist - to do what needs to be done to stop the fires. Nor did it manage evacuation very well - or no one would have died. Officials had adequate warning. They just did not have an adequate emergency plan in place. 8 million people cannot evacuate themselves.
Everything California had put into place since the devastating Camp (Paradise) Fire in 2018, failed. $32 million in special firefighting funds, wasted. The civilian choices were wrong, outdated, and too slow.
California's civilian fire alert monitoring system was quickly overwhelmed. It's Los Angeles evacuation alert system malfunctioned and first sent out false alerts, then did not get the real alerts out to everyone in time. Even those who knew they had to evacuate did not always have the means - available car or mass transit, or were infirm or disabled, or trying to save pets - and California provided no evacuation transportation. No jeeps, helicopters or any real help.
A fire is like a battle. You don't wait 10 days to bring in the real manpower if civilians are at risk. If Israel had been run by California, the entire nation would have been dead. The response must be fast and aggressive. Aren't humans and animals worth this much?
That anyone should have died - or any animals be killed - NEXT TO A SEA FULL OF WATER - was inhumane. America must pay attention to what works in other nations. And that includes WATER as the first choice; and putting the military in control. No other nations let local authorities manage wildfire response. They don't have the training, resources, or expertise in combat that military forces do. A governor is not a battle-trained officer. A governor gets elected by shaking hands and being able to raise money, and speak well on tv. Putting an elected official in charge of a WILDFIRE, is like letting your councilman do surgery on you.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
As of January 15, there were 14,000 trained firefighters deployed to the fires. And thousands of additional 'other' personnel. Still inadequate to contain the fires. US DOD is able to deploy as many troops, Reserves, or National Guard as are needed. And can manage the logistics, housing, and equipment needs long-distance. DOD does this all the time for troops in other nations. It is better equipped - computing and manpower - to provide this function for California, than Sacramento or Los Angeles are.
_________
As of January 15, more than 75,000 civilian firefighters were deployed to the fires. And additional prisoners. With local residents joining in. That's a lot of people. But are they working 'smart' or just hard? Because in theory, that should have been enough to have built fire breaks around every fire and evacuated everyone in danger. And it is still not enough.
“The main function of any fuel break is to break the fuel side of the fire behavior triangle (fuels, weather, and topography). The only leg of that triangle that we can manipulate or control is the fuels.”
–Lance Okeson, Boise District BLM Fuels AFMO
Fuel breaks or fire breaks are less effective against strong wind-driven fires, especially when hot Santa Ana winds are involved, as with these January 2025 Caifornia fires. In general, fire breaks improve success in putting out the wildfires from 40% to 80%. But when Santa Ana winds are involved - as with the 2019 Paradise, CA wildfire that killed 86 people - they are shown to be ineffective. And yet, that was what California spend $32 million on capabilities for, later in 2019.
Fire fighting formulae in general hold that 100 firefighters can build a 3-ft-wide fire break around a 100 acre perimeter in 1 hour. That guidance is based on a common grass wildfire, with flames only 3 ft high on average. But for larger and hotter fires like these current wildfires, the flames may be 100 ft high. And the fire break must be 3 x in width of the height of the flames. Other factors include the slope of the fire's approach, what type of fuel is in front of it, wind and weather conditions, etc. California has traditionally told residents to create a 100-ft 'safety' perimeter around their homes as a firebreak - called a 'defensible space.' (Clearly, this did not work.)
The fire break should be at least 3 x the height of the flames. Videos showed flames in the January fires reaching higher than two-three-story buildings - putting the minimum fire break needed at 300 ' in width, around the perimeters of the fires. Multiplying the above equation x 100 then, arrives at: 1,000 firefighters needed to build a 300' - wide firebreak around 100 acres. But ... is that even adequate for these fires? As of Jan. 15, California reported that 14,000 firefighters, plus additional prison staff, were deployed to the fires.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The town of Paradise, California, was almost completely destroyed in the 2018 Camp Fire — which scorched more than 150,000 acres, killed 86 people, and was the deadliest wildfire in the state's history. it was caused by a frayed electrical power cable. Which is why many LA residents wanted power shut off.
But the tragic thing about the Paradise fire is that residents and firefighters thought they were well-prepared - with fire and fuel breaks up to and around the town. The fire however, driven by Santa Ana winds, raced up the mountain to the town - wildfires climb uphill faster than downhill - and skipped over the fire and fuel breaks and engulfed the town in minutes. Just like with these fires, in 2025.
That's why it is so surprising that LA or the California Governor's office did not immediately reach out to Northcom (US DOD Northern Command, Colorado Springs) for personnel and water bucket support as soon as the LA area fires started. California officials KNEW that Santa Ana winds historically defeated traditional fire and fuel breaks (stripping vegetation in a fire's path); leaving only water as a realistic weapon.
And unlike Paradise, these threatened towns were just next to the sea. So there was no shortage of water. There was just shortage of manpower and helicopters to drop the water.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Some LA media were calling water bucket drops 'low tech' tactics. Hmmm... every Chinook helicopter is a high-tech wonder, costing as 'low' as $8.5 billion each. The only low-tech weapon in the California fires was the state's new 'monitoring' and alert system. It failed almost immediately. And was entirely unnecessary - US military and other space monitoring systems are much more accurate and timely.
No state or local government can ever duplicate sophistication levels of US military or federal agencies.
Water is always the best weapon against a strong wind fire, in areas where the fuel - houses close together - cannot be eliminated. The three prongs of the wildfire triangle are: Fuel - Terrain - Weather. Unless cloud seeding is attempted, which has been used successfully by Russia and other nations but is not in vogue in the US, the only element firefighters can try to control is 'fuel.' If fuel - grass, wood, power lines, trees - cannot be eliminated in front of the fire; or if a back fire (controlled burn in front of the fire) is not realistic; then only water or foam are realistic weapons for containment.
Water however, has much higher efficacy than foam and is able to cover much more territory with each 3,000 gallon bucket. Each bucket, based on past fire data, can soak 30 - 70 acres. Depending on weather, wind, other conditions. When enough water is thrown at a fire's perimeter and ahead of it, it will stop it.
The map above shows how close to the sea - and salvation - the fire-destroyed area are. Palisades is 1 minute by helicopter from the sea. Another minute to load a water bucket - a 5-minute trip for any trained military pilot from sea to water drop over the Palisades or Malibu. How many trips could 1 pilot have made each hour, to douse flames so victims who died, could escape Malibu? How many victims could have been evacuated by military apache or other helicopter, or jeep, by trained personnel?
DOD evacauted 10,000 a day from Afghanistan easily. It can evacuate up to 1 million from any urban area, a day. USAF jets can carry up to 1,000 per flight. NO ONE SHOULD HAVE DIED. That was criminal negligence. Even the furthest fire, Eaton, is only 9 minutes away by flight. The US military can fly in close formation, at high speeds, and drop several 3,000 buckets of water all at once, in a concentrated area. And drop water ahead of the fires.
__________
'The goal of fighting wildfires is less about dousing the flames and more about prevention — dropping water ahead of the fire to stop more flames from catching. The amount of water that we carry — we're not going to put out a flame. It's burning too hot.'
- Army National Guard Staff Sgt. Thomas Barber and Chief Warrant Officer Kyle Pearl, 1-168th Medevac.
__________
This disaster tragically illustrates the danger of letting widespread legalization of mind-altering drugs take hold of an entire state government and population. And officials are elected or employees hired based soley on partisan views and personal lifestyle.
The US Air Force RC-26 (right) provides infrared images and video of fires from above, to map and detect emerging wild fires and hotspots in the western United States. Drones also support this - and California is trying to use its drones. This mapping detects hotspots and emerging threats, and most vulnerable areas for water drops. First Air Force (Air Forces Northern), U.S. Northern Command’s Air Component, is the DoD’s operational lead for the aerial military wildland fire fighting. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Airman 1st Class Thomas Cox)
Above: a Japanese drawing of building demolition during WWII to stop fires..
For a very high fire, a fire break should be significantly wider, typically at least 2-3 times the expected flame height to effectively contain it, which could mean a width ranging from 10 to several hundred feet depending on the fuel type, topography, and wind conditions; in extreme cases, a fire break might need to be even wider.
Assuming
That sounds impossible, but few things are impossible with enough manpower and the right equipment and tools. Additional tactics include demolition of buildings ahead of the fire. And buiding rapid concrete barriers as wind & fire breaks. These are portable segments dropped by helicopter.
The Math Behind Fire Breaks
The accepted formula is that 100 trained personnel can build a 3-ft wide firebreak (in a forest) around 100 acres in 1 hour. But what about fires that gust up to a km (3,250 ft) high? That's where demolishing buildings and throwing up any non-carbon materials to slow them, combined with concentrated water dumps ahead of the fire, are about your only chance. Manpower is needed to evacuate - not everyone has a car, or gas in the tank, or is healthy enough to leave on their own.
*Russia and China have also used cloud seeding with success. In one instance, to save a nuclear power plant.
Most California homes use stucco, or wood, and are built (sometimes) to withstand ground shocks, but not fire. Bremer walls are one type of concrete fire barrier, 12-ft high segments, widely used around US embassies and military installations abroad, to protect against explosions. They are not really tall enough against (most) wild fires. But when thrown up as part of an evacuation, they are able to slow fires from spreading between homes or buildings for up to an hour. And they act as a ground windbreak.
the DC
Strategic Group
PARTNERS
SOLUTIONS
©2025 DC Strategic Group l DSG Global. All rights reserved
Washington DC l London